<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>2019</title>
<link href="https://repository.auw.edu.bd/handle/123456789/739" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://repository.auw.edu.bd/handle/123456789/739</id>
<updated>2026-06-10T01:01:56Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T01:01:56Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Measurements of Entrance Surface Dose and Effective Dose of Patients in Diagnostic Radiography</title>
<link href="https://repository.auw.edu.bd/handle/123456789/922" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Meaze, AKM Moinul Haque</name>
</author>
<id>https://repository.auw.edu.bd/handle/123456789/922</id>
<updated>2026-02-18T06:15:02Z</updated>
<published>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Measurements of Entrance Surface Dose and Effective Dose of Patients in Diagnostic Radiography
Meaze, AKM Moinul Haque
In radiography, a dose to patients primarily depends on the Entrance Surface Dose (ESD) and the sensitivity of organs which are irradiated&#13;
during treatment plan. The main goal of this study is to look into the patient’s dose to assess ESD and ED for patients in digital diagnostic radiography&#13;
examinations for the optimization of radiation protection of the patients who are exposed to radiation dose thereby facing the increasing probability&#13;
of fatal cancer risk and other biological effects. Patients dosimetry carried out on 15 adult patients (Male-4 and Female-11) of age 20 to 69 years.&#13;
The IAEA TRS No. 457 dosimetry protocol was followed in accordance with non-invasive kV-meter, DIAVOLT UNIVERSAL T43014-001400, locating&#13;
at 100 cm from focus to surface distance for measurement of radiological parameters such as kVp and mAs. The ESD has a wide range from 0.05mGy&#13;
to 0.35 mGy for chest even for the same examination carried out on the patients of different age and gender and the corresponding effective dose lies&#13;
from 0.01 to 0.04 mSv, additionally, in other parts like L-spine AP, Lat and in foot ESDs are 1.24 mGy, 2.06 mGy and 0.07 mGy respectively with their&#13;
corresponding EDs are 0.13 mSv, 0.05 mSv and 0.0003 mSv. The ESDs and EDs reported in this study are generally lower than the doses published&#13;
in literatures.
</summary>
<dc:date>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Effective Point of Measurement (EPOM) of Some Ionization Chambers for High Energy Photon Beam Dosimetry used in Radiotherapy for the Treatment of  Cancer Patient</title>
<link href="https://repository.auw.edu.bd/handle/123456789/921" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Meaze, Akm Moinul Haque</name>
</author>
<id>https://repository.auw.edu.bd/handle/123456789/921</id>
<updated>2026-02-18T06:14:55Z</updated>
<published>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Effective Point of Measurement (EPOM) of Some Ionization Chambers for High Energy Photon Beam Dosimetry used in Radiotherapy for the Treatment of  Cancer Patient
Meaze, Akm Moinul Haque
The volumetric effect occupied by the air cavity for the dosimetry of high energy&#13;
photon beam is impossible to ignore using standard ionization chambers. Hence, the&#13;
dose measurement should be corrected with a displacement perturbation correction&#13;
factor (Pdis) or using an Effective Point of Measurement (EPOM). The aim of this study&#13;
was to calculate the EPOM of some ionization chambers and evaluation of the shift of&#13;
EPOM that recommended by various international protocols under both reference and&#13;
non-reference condition. The work was performed with Percentage Depth Dose (PDD)&#13;
curves by placing chambers (PTW 30013, FC 65G and Semiflex 31010) at the geometrical&#13;
centers for field size(s) of 5cm × 5cm to 30cm × 30cm at 100cm Source to Surface&#13;
Distance (SSD) for photon energy 6, 10 and 15MV respectively. The shift of the cylindrical&#13;
chambers also estimated from PDD values in comparison with reference PDD values by&#13;
Parallel Plate Chamber (PPC 40 and Murkus 23343) of 100%, 80% and 50% depth in the&#13;
water. The present study shows that the effective shift is not only varies with chamber&#13;
materials but also with photon energy. On the other hand the periodical calibration factor&#13;
of some ionization chambers at standard procedures were compared with manufacturer&#13;
values also varies with time which is an important issues for the precisional dosimetry in&#13;
radiotherapy. The details of the EPOM and chamber calibration factor is discussed.
</summary>
<dc:date>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
