<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>2015</title>
<link>https://repository.auw.edu.bd/handle/123456789/1117</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 17:03:31 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T17:03:31Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>A Demand for Money Function with Output Uncertainty, Monetary Volatility, and Financial Innovations: Evidence from Japan</title>
<link>https://repository.auw.edu.bd/handle/123456789/1213</link>
<description>A Demand for Money Function with Output Uncertainty, Monetary Volatility, and Financial Innovations: Evidence from Japan
Islam, A.N.M.M.
The impact of monetary policy is essentially determined by the stability of the money demand function. Inclusion of financial&#13;
innovation as a variable led to a more explanatory model which was unable to predict the future. When the inadequacy of&#13;
partial adjustment modeling framework is adjusted, the model faces empirical difficulties. Considering instability of money&#13;
demand is an omitted variable problem, this paper employs Vector Error Correction Method to solve that problem. Output&#13;
volatility, monetary volatility and financial service are included in the model besides real output and nominal interest rate.&#13;
Based on augmented Dicky-Fuller tests and cointegration tests, long run stability of money demand function is established.&#13;
The Vector Error Correction Model yields conventionally expected and statistically significant results for all variables.&#13;
Variance decomposition and impulse response show an increasing effect of monetary volatility, output uncertainty and&#13;
financial services. On the other hand, interest rate and real GDP show declining effect. Innovations in financial service,&#13;
output volatility and monetary volatility are vital in explaining money demand.
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://repository.auw.edu.bd/handle/123456789/1213</guid>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Economic Growth, Economic Freedom, and Corruption: Evidence from  Panel Data</title>
<link>https://repository.auw.edu.bd/handle/123456789/1212</link>
<description>Economic Growth, Economic Freedom, and Corruption: Evidence from  Panel Data
Islam, A.N.M. M.
Economic Freedom is considered to be conducive to growth while corruption is mostly found to be anti-growth. A related&#13;
question could be whether Economic Freedom reduces the possible adverse effect of corruption on economic growth.&#13;
Moreover, how are corruption and growth possibly affected by the major components of Economic Freedom? For example,&#13;
a major element of economic freedom is Size of the Government which consists of taxes, among others. Income tax is&#13;
considered as a levy on agent’s incentive to productive activity by reducing an agent’s property right. However, if revenue&#13;
collected from taxes is used by the government in productive sectors then the adverse effect of taxes might decrease. On the&#13;
other hand, negative effect of taxes on growth might be accentuated by higher degree of corruption. This paper examines&#13;
the effects of corruption, economic freedom and its major components and their possible cross effects with corruption on&#13;
economic growth. By using cross-country data and a panel estimation procedure it turned out that economic freedom was&#13;
generally positively associated while corruption was negatively associated with growth though the result for the later is not&#13;
robust. The influence on corruption seemed to decline in the presence of high degree of Economic Freedom. However, the&#13;
findings were not as robust when components of Economic Freedom were considered separately.
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://repository.auw.edu.bd/handle/123456789/1212</guid>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
